Get a load of this piece of rubbish, from the Washington Post, in which the writer falls all over herself in proclaiming that Jihad does NOT mean armed struggle: http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/susan_brooks_thistlethwaite/2007/07/jihad_mean_struggle.html.
I wonder, does she watch the same newscasts that I do? Does she not see the scenes of Shiites killing Sunnis and vice versa, all in the name of Jihad? Does she not see Muslims of both sects uniting in their desire to massacre Jews and Christians, again in the name of Jihad? Am I just imagining these things?
Even more ironic is the fact that in the very same newspaper, the Washington Post shills for Hezbollah by publishing a piece from one of Hezbollah's leading "spiritual advisors", wherein he specifically says that Jihad consists of "armed resistance": http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/muslims_speak_out/2007/07/sayyed_fadlallah.html. I guess that being a PR arm for Hamas wasn't good enough for the Post...........
2 comments:
Am I just imagining these things?
Yes! Islam is a religion of peace you bigot!
Its the Zionists!!!!
Of COURSE it is. Silly me. What was I thinking?
BHG
Post a Comment