When I read something like this, it just drives me nuts: http://www.nypost.com/seven/11122007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/jerseys_counterterror_farce_382583.htm?page=0.
So, New Jersey doesn't want us to call Islamofascist terrorists by their name, because, you know, that would hurt their feelings. And, we need to involve "academia" in fighting terrorism, which WOULD be a good idea if only so many academics weren't sympathetic to the terrorists and their goals.
What is wrong with these people? This is a classic example of how you cannot fight a politically incorrect war in a politically correct way. It just won't work. It WILL, however, get people killed.
4 comments:
INVASION OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC MOBOTS
Why are Muslims so different, so arrogant, aggressive, predatory and downright dangerous? Why are their leaders so
href="http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2007/11/taqiyya-lies-and-muslim-propagana.html "> deceitful and creepy? And why can
they never live in peace with the rest of us?
To understand what makes Muslims tick, you need to understand how utterly slavishly they imitate the founder of their death-cult, the charlatan and
false prophet Mohammed.
Mohammed was a terrorist, murderer, sadist, rapist, pedophile, slaver, robber,
extortionist, control-freak, liar and charlatan. Okay, so nobody's perfect. But that unfortunately is the problem. Muslims are brainwashed
from infancy into believing that Mohammed was indeed the perfect man,
'al-insan al-kamil and
href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID={05FDA198-5567-4356-8D70-860EFCD9E1EF}"> uswa hasana' the model of
behavior for all those wishing to be obedient to Allah.
So to be a good Muslim is to be robotic clone of the original founder of the the cult, whom you must emulate in every way, and in the process
destroy your own individuality, judgement and conscience. Muslims try to ape Mohammed's behavior down to the tiniest details. For example, one
of the Four Imams, Abmad ibn Hanbal, was a great Traditionalist. It is stated that he would not eat water-melons because, although he knew that
the 'Prophet' ate them, he could not learn whether the 'Prophet' ate
them with or without the rind, or whether he broke, bit or cut them.
Islam is not about right and wrong
thinking but correct behaviour. If one imitates the behaviours of Mohammed, then one is observant and submissive. Morality is not a part of
Islam. If there is a more fundamental difference between Islam and all other creeds and religions I do not know of it. It is so alien that the reader will
have to consider its implications for some time to grasp the full meaning of it.
Muslims often try to deceive Christians and Jews nto believing that Islam, like Christianity and Judaism, is one of three closely related 'Abrahamic
faiths'. But if we examine the ethical basis of Islam, and judge the tree by its fruits, we realise that Islam is totally alien. Judaism and Christianity
have more in common with the unrelated Buddhism than they do with Islam.
For the devout Muslim there is no place for conscience, compassion or empathy, only
href="http://barnsley-nationalists3.blogspot.com/2007/10/jihadists-want-our-kids-dead-or-alive.html"> mobotic behavior patterns programmed
by a long-dead psychopath. There is no morality to be had in Islam. There is consequently no
href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/005959.php "> Golden Rule ('Do not do to another that which would be hurtful to you') or any
other higher ethical principles. There is nothing apart from a huge number of prescribed regulations which must be obsessively and compulsively
observed. Hence the lack of originality and creativity in the Muslim world. The Ummah has effectively only one brain for 1.2 billion people and that
brain belongs to Mohammed.
The muslim has no need for a conscience, because Mohammed's example determines what is right or wrong. If he wants to rape a nine year old girl
or slaughter a few hundred kuffar then he will not be bothered by a guilty conscience, because the 'perfect man' has set the precedents.
One of the principle characteristics of a psychopath is that he
href="http://www.guilford.com/cgi-bin/cartscript.cgi?page=law/hare.htm&cart_id=926536.28901 "> lacks any conscience . So does Islam
actually attempt to turn its adherents into psychopaths? In current clinical use, psychopathy is most commonly diagnosed using the checklist
devised by Emeritus Professor Robert Hare. He describes psychopaths as "intraspecies
predators who use charm, manipulation, intimidation, and violence to control others and to satisfy their own selfish needs. Lacking in conscience and
in feelings for others, they take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without guilt or remorse". "What is
missing, in other words, are the very qualities that allow a human being to live in social harmony.".
Islam produces swarms of mobotic clones programmed to emulate a seveth century psychopath. "It is so alien that the reader will have to consider
its implications for some time to grasp the full meaning of it. "
Ooops, formatting problems again. The comment should be ...
INVASION OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC MOBOTS
Why are Muslims so different, so arrogant, aggressive, predatory and downright dangerous? Why are their leaders so deceitful and creepy? And why can they never live in peace with the rest of us?
To understand what makes Muslims tick, you need to understand how utterly slavishly they imitate the founder of their death-cult, the charlatan and false prophet Mohammed.
Mohammed was a terrorist, murderer, sadist, rapist, pedophile, slaver, robber, extortionist, control-freak, liar and charlatan. Okay, so nobody's perfect. But that unfortunately is the problem. Muslims are brainwashed from infancy into believing that Mohammed was indeed the perfect man, 'al-insan al-kamil and uswa hasana' the model of behavior for all those wishing to be obedient to Allah.
So to be a good Muslim is to be a robotic clone of the original founder of the the cult, whom you must emulate in every way, and in the process destroy your own individuality, judgement and conscience. Muslims try to ape Mohammed's behavior down to the tiniest details. For example, one of the Four Imams, Abmad ibn Hanbal, was a great Traditionalist. It is stated that he would not eat water-melons because, although he knew that the 'Prophet' ate them, he could not learn whether the 'Prophet' ate them with or without the rind, or whether he broke, bit or cut them.
Islam is not about right and wrong thinking but correct behaviour. If one imitates the behaviours of Mohammed, then one is observant and submissive. Morality is not a part of Islam. If there is a more fundamental difference between Islam and all other creeds and religions I do not know of it. It is so alien that the reader will have to consider its implications for some time to grasp the full meaning of it.
Muslims often try to deceive Christians and Jews into believing that Islam, like Christianity and Judaism, is one of three closely related 'Abrahamic faiths'. But if we examine the ethical basis of Islam, and judge the tree by its fruits, we realise that Islam is totally alien. Judaism and Christianity have more in common with the unrelated Buddhism than they do with Islam.
For the devout Muslim there is no place for conscience, compassion or empathy, only mobotic behavior patterns programmed by a long-dead psychopath. There is no morality to be had in Islam. There is consequently no Golden Rule ('Do not do to another that which would be hurtful to you') or any other higher ethical principles. There is nothing apart from a huge number of prescribed regulations which must be obsessively and compulsively observed. Hence the lack of originality and creativity in the Muslim world. The Ummah has effectively only one brain for 1.2 billion people and that brain belongs to Mohammed.
The muslim has no need for a conscience, because Mohammed's example determines what is right or wrong. If he wants to rape a nine year old girl or slaughter a few hundred kuffar then he will not be bothered by a guilty conscience, because the 'perfect man' has set the precedents.
One of the principle characteristics of a psychopath is that he lacks any conscience . So does Islam actually attempt to turn its adherents into psychopaths? In current clinical use, psychopathy is most commonly diagnosed using the checklist devised by Emeritus Professor Robert Hare. He describes psychopaths as "intraspecies predators who use charm, manipulation, intimidation, and violence to control others and to satisfy their own selfish needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for others, they take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without guilt or remorse". "What is missing, in other words, are the very qualities that allow a human being to live in social harmony.".
Islam produces swarms of mobotic clones programmed to emulate a seventh century psychopath. "It is so alien that the reader will have to consider its implications for some time to grasp the full meaning of it. "
Hello BHG! You are no longer 'obscure'. wahabicorridor is here.
We'll stop associating Islam with terror when Muslim do the same.
Post a Comment